On the Asymptotic Width of the Pöschl–Teller Ground State¶
Salvatore Pennacchio — Independent Researcher — October 2026
Abstract¶
We consider the one-dimensional Schrödinger operator
and compute the effective width of its ground state
We show that the ground state is
and that in the limit \(\mu\to\infty\) the exact asymptotic relation holds:
The coefficient \(3/2\) is derived from Gaussian moments and has no relation to the golden ratio. The exact form of \(\psi_0\) is checked against direct diagonalization to \(<0.3\%\) on \(\mu\in[1,20]\), and \(a\,\ell^2_{\rm op}\) approaches \(3/2\) from above as \(\mu\) grows.
1. Setup¶
1.1 The operator¶
Let
This is a particular case of the Pöschl–Teller potential, for which the eigenvalue equation
is exactly integrable. The potential is a symmetric well centered at \(r=0\), of depth \(2\mu\), with exponential decay as \(|r|\to\infty\).
1.2 Ground state — exact form¶
We propose the form \(\psi(r) = \mathrm{sech}^a(r)\) for an exponent \(a>0\) to be determined. We compute
Using \(\tanh^2 = 1-\mathrm{sech}^2\),
Substituting into the Schrödinger equation:
For \(\psi\) to be an eigenfunction, the \(\mathrm{sech}^2\) term must vanish:
The only positive root is
The corresponding eigenvalue is
Therefore
Remark. \(\psi_0 = \mathrm{sech}^\mu(r)\) holds only for \(\mu=1\) (where \(a(1)=1\)). For \(\mu>1\), \(a(\mu)<\mu\): for example \(a(2)\approx 1.5616\), \(a(5)\approx 2.7016\), \(a(10)=4\).
2. Effective width¶
We define the effective width of the ground state as
The normalization is known:
The moments \(\langle r^2\rangle\) and \(\langle r^4\rangle\) are computed numerically with arbitrary precision (mpmath, 40 digits).
3. Asymptotic behavior¶
3.1 Theorem¶
Theorem. For \(\mu\to\infty\), with \(a(\mu) = (\sqrt{1+8\mu}-1)/2\),
In particular:
3.2 Proof¶
For \(a\to\infty\), the function \(\mathrm{sech}^{2a}(r)\) is concentrated in a neighborhood of \(r=0\). Using the Taylor expansion
we obtain
The density \(|\psi_0(r)|^2\) is therefore asymptotically Gaussian with variance
For a Gaussian centered at \(0\), the moments are exact:
Hence
The corrections \(O(a^{-1})\) arise from the non-Gaussian terms of the expansion of \(\ln\mathrm{sech}(r)\), that is, from the coefficient \(-r^4/12\). \(\square\)
3.3 Limit in \(\mu\)¶
Since \(a(\mu)\sim\sqrt{2\mu}\) as \(\mu\to\infty\),
The factor \(8 = 2^3\) is \(\sigma^{-2}\) in units of \(\mu\): \(\sigma^2 = 1/(2a) \sim 1/(2\sqrt{2\mu}) = 1/\sqrt{8\mu}\).
4. Numerical verification¶
4.1 Numerical vs analytical¶
Comparison between direct numerical computation (matrix \(H\) with \(N=600\) points on \([-25,25]\)) and analytical computation with \(\psi_0 = \mathrm{sech}^{a(\mu)}(r)\) and mpmath integration at 40 digits:
| \(\mu\) | \(a(\mu)\) | \(\ell^2_{\rm num}\) | \(\ell^2_{\rm anal}\) | diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.0 | 1.0000 | 3.45361043 | 3.45436154 | 0.022% |
| 1.5 | 1.3028 | 2.22222712 | 2.22293719 | 0.032% |
| 2.0 | 1.5616 | 1.67140280 | 1.67211855 | 0.043% |
| 3.0 | 2.0000 | 1.15812782 | 1.15887005 | 0.064% |
| 5.0 | 2.7016 | 0.76514280 | 0.76592314 | 0.102% |
| 10.0 | 4.0000 | 0.46443338 | 0.46525320 | 0.177% |
| 20.0 | 5.8443 | 0.29627936 | 0.29712267 | 0.285% |
Numerical and analytical agree to within \(0.3\%\). The difference grows with \(\mu\) and is attributable to discretization (the width \(\sigma\sim 1/\sqrt{2a}\) becomes comparable to \(dr\)).
4.2 Convergence to \(3/2\)¶
| \(\mu\) | \(a(\mu)\) | \(\ell^2_{\rm anal}\) | \(a\cdot\ell^2\) | \(3/2 - a\cdot\ell^2\) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| \(\mu\) | \(a(\mu)\) | \(a\cdot\ell^2\) | \(3/2 - a\cdot\ell^2\) | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| 10 | 4.00 | 1.86101279 | \(-0.36101\) | |
| 20 | 5.84 | 1.73647067 | \(-0.23647\) | |
| 50 | 9.51 | 1.63985974 | \(-0.13986\) | |
| 100 | 13.65 | 1.59565221 | \(-0.09565\) | |
| 200 | 19.51 | 1.56607405 | \(-0.06607\) | |
| 500 | 31.13 | 1.54093780 | \(-0.04094\) | |
| 1000 | 44.22 | 1.52865045 | \(-0.02865\) |
The product \(a\cdot\ell^2\) decreases monotonically toward \(3/2 = 1.5\) from above. The residual \(a\ell^2 - 3/2\) shrinks roughly as \(1/a\) (\(0.0957\cdot 13.65 \approx 1.31\), \(0.0287\cdot 44.22 \approx 1.27\)), consistent with the \(O(1/a)\) correction; at \(\mu=1000\) it is still \(1.9\%\).
5. Discussion¶
5.1 What this is not¶
This note does not claim that:
- the number \(3/2\) has any relation to the golden ratio \(\Phi = (1+\sqrt5)/2\);
- there are connections with \(\psi = (1-\sqrt5)/2\), \(5/\Phi\), \(2/\Phi\), or other algebraic constants;
- the factor \(3/2\) encodes any hidden physical structure.
The factor \(3/2\) is the ratio between the fourth and the second moment of a Gaussian:
The \(3\) is the coefficient of the Gaussian fourth moment, the \(2\) comes from \(\sigma^2 = 1/(2a)\). Nothing else.
5.2 What this is¶
An exact asymptotic result, derivable, with the following content:
- The ground state of \(H(\mu) = -d^2/dr^2 - 2\mu\,\mathrm{sech}^2(r)\) is \(\psi_0 = \mathrm{sech}^{a(\mu)}(r)\) with \(a(\mu) = (\sqrt{1+8\mu}-1)/2\).
- The effective width \(\ell^2_{\rm op}(\mu) = \langle r^4\rangle/\langle r^2\rangle\) is asymptotically \(3/(2a(\mu))\).
- The first-order correction is \(O(a^{-1})\), consistent with the non-Gaussian expansion of \(\ln\mathrm{sech}\).
5.3 Application¶
This result has been used as an ingredient in the construction of a map between the Gentile gas \(Z_k(\beta) = \zeta(\beta)/\zeta((k+1)\beta)\) and the Jusufi–Anand metric \(f(r) = 1 - 2GMr/(r^2+\ell^2)\). In that context, \(\ell^2_{\rm op}\) is the effective operator length which, substituted into the metric, reproduces the horizon area. The asymptotic relation \(a\cdot\ell^2 \to 3/2\) is the one that fixes the scale of \(\ell^2\) for large \(\mu\). Section 2b of the script tests the matching \(\ell^2_{\rm op}(\mu,\varepsilon) = 4\,\ell^2_{\rm gas}(k,\beta)\) by choosing \((\mu,\varepsilon)\) on a \(40\times 8\) grid for each \((k,\beta)\): the match is within \(1.4\%\) for \(\beta\ge 1.5\) and between \(4.5\%\) and \(6.9\%\) at \(\beta = 1.05\), where the grid's smallest \(\ell^2_{\rm op}\) is reached.
6. References¶
- G. Pöschl, E. Teller, Bemerkungen zur Quantenmechanik des anharmonischen Oszillators, Z. Phys. 83, 143 (1933).
- L. D. Landau, E. M. Lifshitz, Quantum Mechanics: Non-Relativistic Theory, 3rd ed., Pergamon (1977), §23.
- F. Cooper, A. Khare, U. Sukhatme, Supersymmetry and Quantum Mechanics, Phys. Rep. 251, 267 (1995).
- R. M. Corless, G. H. Gonnet, D. E. G. Hare, D. J. Jeffrey, D. E. Knuth, On the Lambert W function, Adv. Comput. Math. 5, 329 (1996).
- S. Pennacchio, A commutative map between the Gentile statistical family and the Jusufi–Anand metric via the Lambert W function, technical note (2026).
7. Verification¶
The verification code is scripts/dvpt/dvpt_poschl_teller_width.py: section 1 (setup), section 2a (numerical–analytical verification), section 2b (gas matching), section 3 (convergence to \(3/2\)).
All computations are reproducible with:
Requirements: numpy, scipy, mpmath. Default precision: mpmath at 40 decimal digits.